Legal and Social Dimensions of Live-in-Relationships in India: A Critical Analysis of Rights, Challenges, and Judicial Perspectives
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53724/ambition/v10n1.04Keywords:
Live-in relationships, Indian law, judicial interpretation, societal perception, domestic violence, maintenance rights, cohabitation, personal autonomy, legal reforms, legal recognitionAbstract
Despite not being officially recognized by Indian personal laws, live-in partnerships have grown in importance both legally and socially throughout time. With an emphasis on partner rights, societal issues, and judicial viewpoints, this study critically examines the legal and social aspects of cohabitation in India. The paper examines the changing legal framework that regulates these kinds of partnerships, particularly the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act of 2005's acknowledgment of rights pertaining to maintenance, inheritance, child legitimacy, and protection from domestic abuse. It also looks at how, in the lack of a particular legislative framework, the SC and many High Courts have interpreted the rights of cohabitating partners. From a social perspective, live-in relationships remain controversial due to deeply rooted cultural and moral values, often facing stigma and lack of societal acceptance. The research highlights the contrast between legal acknowledgment and societal resistance, analysing public perceptions, gender dynamics, and the impact of such relationships on marriage and family structures. Additionally, the paper discusses the challenges in establishing the legitimacy. By assessing judicial precedents and legal gaps, object of study is to provide the necessity of a comprehensive legal framework to safeguard the rights of live-in partners while addressing societal concerns. The findings underscore the need for balancing personal autonomy with social stability, advocating for progressive legal reforms in India.
Metrics
References
D. Velusamy v. D. Patchaiammal (2010) 10 SCC 469.
Revanasiddappa v. Mallikarjun (2011) 11 SCC 1.
Lata Singh v. State of U.P., (2006) 5 SCC 475.
The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.
The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Section 16.
Revanasiddappa v. Mallikarjun (2011) 11 SCC 1.
Tulsa v. Durghatiya (2008) 4 SCC 520.
Bharatha Matha v. R. Vijaya Renganathan (2010) 11 SCC 483.
Shakti Vahini v. Union of India (2018) 7 SCC 192.
S. Khushboo v. Kanniammal & Anr. (2010) 5 SCC 600.
Supra, 2
Ajay Bhardwaj v. Jyotsna, AIR 2023 SC 129.
Supra, 3
Tulsa v. Durghatiya (2008) 4 SCC 520.
Kamala v. Mohan Kumar (2019) SCC Online SC 941.
Chanmuniya v. Virendra Kumar Singh Kushwaha, (2011) 1 SCC 141.
Bharatha Matha v. R. Vijaya Renganathan, (2010) 11 SCC 483.
The Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, and the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015
Sarla Mudgal v. Union of India, (1995) 3 SCC 635.
Supra,1
Supra, 11
Supra 12
Supra, 11
Supra, 4
Supra, 16
Supra, 1
Supra, 11
Supra, 4
Supra, 12
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
ARK
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.